The Hollowing Out of CMA

The longer one stays involved in martial arts, the more obvious it becomes that certain arts / lines / groups have a serious case of “The Emperor’s New Clothes”. The phenomenon I’m referring to is where a comprehensive, usable fighting art gets degraded as it passes through the generations, until all that is left is an empty dance, a husk masquerading as a martial art.

In the description that follows I will deliberately avoid mentioning specific arts, as my intention is not to start a flame war. What I want to discuss in this blog post is a general trend in the world of CMA.

Generally what we see in Chinese martial arts (CMA) and possibly Japanese MA (JMA) as well – although I don’t have enough experience with JMA to make that call – is that during the heyday of the art, which for a lot of CMA was the late Qing dynasty, the art was practical,  comprehensive (including conditioning, applications, sparring, neigong, etc), and training was with a view to actually using the art. This applies to several famous CMA that we can think of, such as taiji, xingyi, bagua, baji, etc.

Then, with the passage with time, various historical and personal factors conspired to dilute the art:

  1. Withholding the Art:

Certainly in the older generation of teachers it was not uncommon for teachers to withhold certain key aspects of the art such as neigong. In extreme cases, this meant that that material may be lost from that line altogether. Controversial examples would be the 24 neigong set in Wu style taiji, or the 72 kicks set in Jiang Rongqiao bagua.

  1. Selective Teaching / Favouritism:

Historically, for most TCMA in most places in China, the majority of the real teaching did not take place in formal classes but in small gatherings in parks or at the teacher’s house, or even one-on-one. The result of this is that it is / was common for teachers to be very selective about what materials were taught to certain students. In the xingyi that I practice I know for sure that there are portions of the art that are held very close to the chest and are not demonstrated in public, and I’m sure this is the same for my friends studying other traditional CMA.

  1. Cultural Revolution:

The damage wrought by the Cultural Revolution to CMA in China cannot be overestimated. Many famous taiji masters, such as Wang Peisheng, Yang Chengfu’s disciple Cui Yishi, Chen Xiaowang’s father Chen Zhaoxu etc were all struggled against. On the xingyi side masters like Zhu Guofu, Zheng Huaixian (Sun style), and Liu Molin (famous Hebei style master in Shanghai) were all targets of public struggle sessions. The word in Shanghai kungfu circles is that in the end Liu Molin could not stand the beatings and denunciations and committed suicide by jumping in the Huangpu river. Even if masters survived the Cultural Revolution, in most cases they were not allowed to teach and in certain examples were not even allowed to practice their arts. For example it is said that red guards were posted outside the house of Zheng Jun, the son of the famous Zhaobao taiji master Zheng Wuqing, to stop him from practicing!

  1. Chinese Political Environment

Even after the Cultural Revolution had passed and China started opening up, the Chinese government viewed the practice of real martial arts as at best a waste of time and at worst a threat to its control over its people. The teaching of fighting techniques in public was frowned upon, and even ostensibly less violent forms of practice such as stand-up wrestling received no government support.

  1. Commercialization of the Art / McDojo-isation

Separate to the trend of development of TCMA in China, other trends in the West also helped to further the dilution of the arts. Unlike China, the main way TCMA has spread in the West is through commercial schools (dojo / wuguan). This has the advantage that the art (hopefully) is taught in a more public, systematic way, but also has the associated downside that it can lead to creating a large pool of people who have only obtained a superficial understanding of the art, to the point where they may not have even learned the choreography of the main forms properly. If these people then go on to teach, the results can be imagined.

What is left at the end of this process is just a dance or form of calisthenics, fine for general exercise but devoid of any real martial substance, and not leading to any real fighting ability.

If you (like me) are studying TCMA not just for health but also with the genuine intention of at least being able to use what you have learnt, then you need to ask yourself:

  • Do I know the usage of these moves that I’m learning?
  • Can I actually use these moves under pressure?
  • In the system that I am learning, is there a systematic step-by-step training method that leads from training applications to controlled sparring to semi-realistic fighting conditions?

If the answers to all of those questions are yes, congratulations! You are on the right track 🙂

About yosaku

Xingyiquan enthusiast
This entry was posted in historical interest and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Hollowing Out of CMA

  1. Angelika says:

    I think for old arts, especially arts that can only be transmitted by DOING them, it is hard to survive over the centuries.

    And I do not see commercialization as such a bad thing. Because if more people practice (even at a low level), the more people will know about the existence of CMA. If more people can be intrigued by it, it is just more likely that some individuals will emerge who are actually very serious about it, get to a very high level and try to preserve and teach as good as they can! Like a pyramid it is important to have a strong base to have a high top!

    • yosaku says:

      Agreed, that’s a very good point. I think commercialisation can actually help the art, IF it is done with good quality control. At the end of the day it is down to the association and teachers, if one person starts handing out teaching certificates willy nilly, then the whole situation can go south very quickly.

  2. I came to martial arts and the chinese boxing studies as part of my military training, training to fight, full time 8-10 hrs a day 7 days a week for years, traditional training in china would have been like this, china has never realy been at peace, this is only ever going to be done by a very few and I can only hope to get 1 in a 100 students who are willing to go through that level of training so I teach what I can to who I can and hope each student gets out of training what they need.
    To students i say look around keep an open mind and learn what you can where you can
    To teachers i say let your students learn where and with who they want and dont be afraid of saying I can only take you so far along the path.

  3. Ed says:

    Good points – I think, for one, “tight-fistedness” seems to have been part of Chinese culture for a long time, which doesn’t help! And all those other things don’t help, either. The few that got “the goods” despite these obstacles were those who were able to be the favorite, most talented, as well as politically and personally lucky! In some cases, it helped to be practitioners of less well-known lineages, e.g. Liang style bagua or Zhaobao/Huleijia style taiji, since they might not be as prominent as some others.

  4. I am going down the route come together as a group of like minded people train together I will help you find the principles you will test my knowledge and skill and keep me honest. What ever level you are at some one should be designated as the one to tell you when you are crap.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s